Blog: Layer 8 Lounge Recap: What DDI Metrics Actually Matter?
TL;DR
The community wants alerts driven by a tight set of meaningful metrics, not wall-to-wall dashboards. Top pain points: log volume and cost, inconsistent JSON formats, and the lack of sensible, role-based default alerts. Capacity trends (queues, leases, range headroom) and DHCP “noisy talkers” surfaced as practical early warnings. See questions, answers, and open follow-ups below.
Key Findings
-
Alerts over dashboards: Day-to-day ops should rely on right-sized alerts; dashboards are for investigations and reviews.
-
Cut noise at the source: Logging is too verbose/variable; JSON needs normalization and tunable profiles.
-
Make “base alerts” turnkey: Ship sensible defaults by role (BAM/DNS/DHCP/edge) with global apply.
-
Watch capacity + chatter: Short-horizon trends and DHCP churn/noisy talkers are reliable early signals.
-
Operator vs. exec: Operators need thresholds/anomalies; leadership wants summarized health/utilization.
Questions Asked → Answers Given
1) What do you actually check first?
Many start with email/Teams for incident signals; desire to replace manual checks with automated alerts. Real incident: misconfig multiplied DHCP requests (~10K/day → 65M/day), stressing DNS registration.
Still needed: A starter alert pack (metrics + thresholds) so teams aren’t building from zero. Today Infrastructure Assurance can provide that and there will be more to come with Integrity X, with the support of this call in the future.
2) What metrics/logs are too much?
-
Log deluge (often debug-like) drives SIEM cost; JSON logs are heavier and harder to parse.
-
Query logging can slow external resolvers; teams sample (log one node, keep others fast).
What helps:
-
Normalized JSON schema across components and a minimal/standard/verbose profile.
-
Guidance on which fields are critical vs. optional for incident workflows.
3) Where should default alerts exist by… default?
-
Out-of-box coverage is thin; teams want role-based default alerts and global apply.
-
Examples requested: subnet ≥90% utilization, DNS/DHCP rate anomalies, queue saturation, zone transfer failures, health thresholds.
What helps:
-
A monitoring blueprint: 10–15 must-have alerts + example thresholds and suppression rules.
-
Easier grouping/targeting of notifications at scale.
4) Activity vs. query logging — what’s practical?
-
JSON activity logs produce higher ingestion; inconsistent fields across sources break dashboards.
-
Performance metric that matters: query processing time (receive→resolve) to catch outliers (normally sub-ms).
What helps:
-
Guidance on when to use activity vs. query logging, sampling strategies, and safe verbosity levels.
5) Which log levels and can we forward to multiple SIEMs?
-
Levels are hierarchical (higher includes lower).
-
Need proper source-type classification so logs don’t appear as generic “Linux/Debian.”
What helps:
-
Recipes for multi-destination forwarding (e.g., Splunk + QRadar) and source-type mapping best practices.
-
Clear mapping of syslog vs. data audit (coverage and use cases).
6) Do you forecast capacity? How about DHCP “noisy talkers”?
-
Yes to short-term trends (leases, ranges, queues).
-
DHCP chatter/noisy talkers are tracked but should inform alerts instead of requiring constant dashboard watching.
-
Case: Windows “Relentless Renewals” (thousands/hour) tied to client power settings; trends exposed it.
What helps:
-
Simple capacity trend recipes (2–4 weeks) and alert examples for queue saturation, range headroom, lease churn, noisy talkers.
Open Follow-Ups:
-
Starter alert pack: Curate a default set of alerts (metrics, thresholds, scope) by role.
-
JSON normalization: Publish a unified field schema + minimal/standard/verbose profiles.
-
Logging guidance: Document when to use activity vs. query logging, and sampling patterns for externals.
-
Multi-SIEM forwarding: Show dual-destination examples (Splunk + QRadar), with port/transport notes.
-
Source-type mapping: Provide recipes to classify logs correctly (no more “generic Debian”).
-
Global notifications: How to apply alert groups at scale (current and future BDDS).
-
Capacity/churn playbooks: Quick starts for queue, range, lease churn, noisy talker alerts (plus anti-flap tuning).
Magic Moments and useful anecdotes
-
DHCP multiplier meltdown: One misconfig turned each request into eight, creating ~65M/day; illustrates the need for anomaly alerts and guardrails.
-
Query logging vs. performance: Heavy query logging slowed external DNS; teams now sample one node for visibility.
-
Relentless renewals: Abnormal DHCP renewals traced to client power settings, proving the value of short-term capacity trends.
Bottom Line
Teams want to start with a narrow, meaningful alert set, keep logs lean and consistent, and rely on short-term capacity trends plus DHCP chatter detection for early warning. We’ll compile community inputs to help direct future releases!